[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20151008.044253.925506191056148131.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2015 04:42:53 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: arnd@...db.de
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, fw@...len.de, pablo@...filter.org,
ebiederm@...ssion.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bridge/netfilter: avoid unused label warning
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2015 21:22:12 +0200
> With the ARM mini2440_defconfig, the bridge netfilter code gets
> built with both CONFIG_NF_DEFRAG_IPV4 and CONFIG_NF_DEFRAG_IPV6
> disabled, which leads to a harmless gcc warning:
>
> net/bridge/br_netfilter_hooks.c: In function 'br_nf_dev_queue_xmit':
> net/bridge/br_netfilter_hooks.c:792:2: warning: label 'drop' defined but not used [-Wunused-label]
>
> This gets rid of the warning by cleaning up the code to avoid
> the respective #ifdefs causing this problem, and replacing them
> with if(IS_ENABLED()) checks. I have verified that the resulting
> object code is unchanged, and an additional advantage is that
> we now get compile coverage of the unused functions in more
> configurations.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> Fixes: dd302b59bde0 ("netfilter: bridge: don't leak skb in error paths")
This commit is in v4.2-rc3 and later, but this patch only applies to net-next
as far as I can tell.
Wouldn't it be better to base this on 'net', or even better Pablo's netfilter
fixes tree, and while you are at it submit it properly to netfilter-devel
with Pablo CC:'d as well?
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists