[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4129407.LpDXnpSZOL@wuerfel>
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 17:57:24 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: linux@...ck-us.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] net: hisilicon: Never build on SPARC
On Wednesday 21 October 2015 08:33:11 David Miller wrote:
> From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
> Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 07:56:18 -0700
>
> >> @@ -57,6 +57,11 @@ extern int of_dma_get_range(struct device_node *np,
> >> u64 *dma_addr,
> >> u64 *paddr, u64 *size);
> >> extern bool of_dma_is_coherent(struct device_node *np);
> >> #else /* CONFIG_OF_ADDRESS */
> >> +static inline u64 of_translate_address(struct device_node *np, const
> >> __be32 *addr)
> >> +{
> >> + return 0;
> >
> > Maybe return OF_BAD_ADDR ?
>
> The thing to really do on sparc, is just return the address raw untranslated
> because that just works.
>
We still need to check #address-cells, right?
Something like this?
static inline u64 of_translate_address(struct device_node *np, const __be32 *addr)
{
#if defined(CONFIG_SPARC) || defined(CONFIG_M68K)
int pna = of_n_addr_cells(np);
u64 ret = be32_to_cpu(addr[pna - 1]);
if (pna > 1)
ret += (u64)be32_to_cpu(addr[pna - 2]) << 32;
return ret;
#else
return OF_BAD_ADDR;
#endif
}
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists