netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] bpf: fix bpf_perf_event

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 21 Oct 2015 23:21:48 -0700
From:	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>
To:	"Wangnan (F)" <wangnan0@...wei.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	He Kuang <hekuang@...wei.com>, Kaixu Xia <xiakaixu@...wei.com>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] bpf: fix bpf_perf_event_read() helper

On 10/21/15 10:31 PM, Wangnan (F) wrote:
>> +    if ((attr->type != PERF_TYPE_RAW &&
>> +         !(attr->type == PERF_TYPE_SOFTWARE &&
>> +           attr->config == PERF_COUNT_SW_BPF_OUTPUT) &&
>> +         attr->type != PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE) ||
>> +        attr->inherit) {
>
> This 'if' statement is so complex. What about using a inline function
> instead?

hmm. don't see how inline function will help readability.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html