[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <562892C8.7030108@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 15:39:52 +0800
From: "Wangnan (F)" <wangnan0@...wei.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
He Kuang <hekuang@...wei.com>, Kaixu Xia <xiakaixu@...wei.com>,
"Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@...earbox.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] bpf: fix bpf_perf_event_read() helper
On 2015/10/22 14:21, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On 10/21/15 10:31 PM, Wangnan (F) wrote:
>>> + if ((attr->type != PERF_TYPE_RAW &&
>>> + !(attr->type == PERF_TYPE_SOFTWARE &&
>>> + attr->config == PERF_COUNT_SW_BPF_OUTPUT) &&
>>> + attr->type != PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE) ||
>>> + attr->inherit) {
>>
>> This 'if' statement is so complex. What about using a inline function
>> instead?
>
> hmm. don't see how inline function will help readability.
>
For example (not tested):
static inline bool perf_event_can_insert_to_map(struct perf_event_attr
*attr)
{
/* is inherit? */
if (attr->inherit)
return false;
/* is software event? */
if (attr->type == PERF_TYPE_SOFTWARE)
if (attr->config == PERF_COUNT_SW_BPF_OUTPUT)
return true;
else
return false;
/* Comment... */
if (attr->type == PERF_TYPE_RAW)
return true;
if (attr->type == PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE)
return true;
return false;
}
...
if (!perf_event_can_insert_to_map(attr))
....
Do you think redability is improved?
Thank you.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists