[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5638CF57.9070203@brocade.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2015 15:14:31 +0000
From: Robert Shearman <rshearma@...cade.com>
To: roopa <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
CC: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] mpls: Don't accept multipath configuration until
the support is complete
On 03/11/15 14:03, roopa wrote:
> On 11/2/15, 10:09 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com> writes:
>>
>>> Hello.
>>>> diff --git a/net/mpls/af_mpls.c b/net/mpls/af_mpls.c
>>>> index c70d750148b6..893cd2dc3979 100644
>>>> --- a/net/mpls/af_mpls.c
>>>> +++ b/net/mpls/af_mpls.c
>>>> @@ -1162,6 +1162,8 @@ static int rtm_to_route_config(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
>>>> {
>>>> cfg->rc_mp = nla_data(nla);
>>>> cfg->rc_mp_len = nla_len(nla);
>>>> + /* Fail until multipath support is complete */
>>>> + goto errout;
>>>> break;
>>> Forgot to delete *break*?
>> Nope. I did that deliberately, because this code is not supposed to
>> stay this way for long.
> Eric, this is only until dead route support is added correct ?.
> If yes, then my v2 on dead route/nh support is out. I know david is only taking bug fixes right now...
> and I thought the dead route/nh is a bug fix. If you are ok with v2, we could skip this patch ?.
Roopa,
I think we should take our time with the dead nexthop changes, and
Eric's patch gives us that time.
Thanks,
Rob
>
> If david decides to not pick it up in net-next, i was hoping to submit it as a bug-fix to net.
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists