[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20151108.221121.799120546619596684.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2015 22:11:21 -0500 (EST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: daniel@...earbox.net
Cc: eric.dumazet@...il.com, edumazet@...gle.com, willemb@...gle.com,
tklauser@...tanz.ch, netdev@...r.kernel.org, jasowang@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/2] packet: do skb_probe_transport_header when we
actually have data
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2015 01:33:56 +0100
> Hmm, yeah, on a (only quick) look, it seems this is mostly needed for
> the
> virtio_net related code in packet_snd() / packet_recvmsg(), not
> handled in
> RX/TX ring paths actually.
>
> $ git grep -n gso_size net/packet/
> net/packet/af_packet.c:2748: if (vnet_hdr.gso_size == 0)
> net/packet/af_packet.c:2825: skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_size =
> net/packet/af_packet.c:2826: __virtio16_to_cpu(vio_le(),
> vnet_hdr.gso_size);
> net/packet/af_packet.c:3219: vnet_hdr.gso_size =
> net/packet/af_packet.c:3220: __cpu_to_virtio16(vio_le(),
> sinfo->gso_size);
>
> Need to take a closer look on Monday.
I think for complete safety, we need the transport header set for
all SKBs once they hit the device.
I know this is separate from the bugs you are trying to fix, but
let's take care of this in this series ok?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists