[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151110142550.GB29568@ketchup.mtl.sfl>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 09:25:51 -0500
From: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>
To: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] net: dsa: mv88e6060: add register defines header file
Hi Neil,
On Nov. Tuesday 10 (46) 02:25 PM, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> To align with the mv88e6xxx code, add a similar header file
> with all the register defines.
> The file is based on the mv88e6xxx header for coherency.
>
> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>
In the RFC patchset, Andrew mentioned that there is not that much things in
common with mv88e6xxx, so I don't really see a value to add a separate header
file. Would that make sense to you guys to add the defines directly in
mv88e6060.c and squash that in the last patch?
> ---
> drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6060.h | 108 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 108 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6060.h
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6060.h b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6060.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..adbc894
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6060.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,108 @@
> +/*
> + * net/dsa/mv88e6060.h - Marvell 88e6060 switch chip support
> + * Copyright (c) 2008 Marvell Semiconductor
Also I don't think the copyright notice is correct here.
Thanks,
-v
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists