[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <564D0EFA.7050806@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 15:51:22 -0800
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>,
Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] dsa: mv88e6xxx.c: Hardware reset the chip
if available
On 18/11/15 15:29, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> The device tree binding now allows a gpio to be specified which is
> attached to the switch chips reset line. If it is defined, perform
> a hardware reset on the switch during setup.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
> ---
> drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx.c b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx.c
> index b06dba05594a..c0bbbe7713c5 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx.c
> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
> #include <linux/list.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/netdevice.h>
> +#include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
> #include <linux/phy.h>
> #include <net/dsa.h>
> #include <net/switchdev.h>
> @@ -2323,7 +2324,10 @@ int mv88e6xxx_switch_reset(struct dsa_switch *ds, bool ppu_active)
> {
> struct mv88e6xxx_priv_state *ps = ds_to_priv(ds);
> u16 is_reset = (ppu_active ? 0x8800 : 0xc800);
> + int gpio = ds->pd->reset;
> + int flags = ds->pd->reset_flags;
> unsigned long timeout;
> + int on = 1;
> int ret;
> int i;
>
> @@ -2336,6 +2340,16 @@ int mv88e6xxx_switch_reset(struct dsa_switch *ds, bool ppu_active)
> /* Wait for transmit queues to drain. */
> usleep_range(2000, 4000);
>
> + /* If there is a gpio connected to the reset pin, toggle it */
> + if (gpio_is_valid(gpio)) {
> + if (flags && OF_GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW)
> + on = !on;
> + gpio_set_value_cansleep(gpio, on);
> + usleep_range(10000, 20000);
> + gpio_set_value_cansleep(gpio, !on);
> + usleep_range(10000, 20000);
> + }
We are embedding reset logic here about the delays and polarity, while
there is now a proper abstraction for this within the reset controller
subsystem under drivers/reset/core.c. Could we utilize that facility
instead which would make us more robust wrt. non-GPIO reset lines (for
instance some SF2 switches on DSL gateways could definitively benefit
from this).
There does not seem to be a reset controller GPIO binding and generic
driver, but this seems like an appropriate candidate?
--
Florian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists