[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5654AF90.9060500@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 10:42:24 -0800
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To: John Crispin <blogic@...nwrt.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Michael Lee <igvtee@...il.com>,
Felix Fietkau <nbd@...nwrt.org>,
"Steven Liu (劉人豪)"
<steven.liu@...iatek.com>,
"Fred Chang (張嘉宏)"
<Fred.Chang@...iatek.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
jogo@...nwrt.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 2/8] net-next: phy: dont auto handle carrier state when
multiple phys are attached
On 22/11/15 00:40, John Crispin wrote:
> A network core might have more than one phy attached to its cpu port via a
> switch. The current code will set the carrier state to on/off when ever a
> cable is plugged into any of these ports.
Not really, no. The current PHY library implementation does not allow
more than one net_device instance to be bound to multiple PHY devices.
Since this is an integrated switch, you should really expose per-port
network devices, that is the paradigm we settled down on using for
Ethernet switches now (irrespective of using DSA or switchdev, or both).
>
> The patch adds a new bool that allows the driver to tell the phy_device to not
> set the carrier state. Instead the driver can manually handle the carrier
> state.
I am missing the bigger picture of how this is used, also, if link down
is a problem, would not link up be for the same reasons?
>
> Signed-off-by: John Crispin <blogic@...nwrt.org>
> Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau <nbd@...nwrt.org>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Lee <igvtee@...il.com>
> Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/phy/phy.c | 9 ++++++---
> include/linux/phy.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/phy.c b/drivers/net/phy/phy.c
> index 48ce6ef..bd2df40 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/phy/phy.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/phy.c
> @@ -843,7 +843,8 @@ void phy_state_machine(struct work_struct *work)
> /* If the link is down, give up on negotiation for now */
> if (!phydev->link) {
> phydev->state = PHY_NOLINK;
> - netif_carrier_off(phydev->attached_dev);
> + if (!phydev->no_auto_carrier_off)
> + netif_carrier_off(phydev->attached_dev);
> phydev->adjust_link(phydev->attached_dev);
> break;
> }
> @@ -926,7 +927,8 @@ void phy_state_machine(struct work_struct *work)
> netif_carrier_on(phydev->attached_dev);
> } else {
> phydev->state = PHY_NOLINK;
> - netif_carrier_off(phydev->attached_dev);
> + if (!phydev->no_auto_carrier_off)
> + netif_carrier_off(phydev->attached_dev);
> }
>
> phydev->adjust_link(phydev->attached_dev);
> @@ -938,7 +940,8 @@ void phy_state_machine(struct work_struct *work)
> case PHY_HALTED:
> if (phydev->link) {
> phydev->link = 0;
> - netif_carrier_off(phydev->attached_dev);
> + if (!phydev->no_auto_carrier_off)
> + netif_carrier_off(phydev->attached_dev);
> phydev->adjust_link(phydev->attached_dev);
> do_suspend = true;
> }
> diff --git a/include/linux/phy.h b/include/linux/phy.h
> index 05fde31..276ab8a 100644
> --- a/include/linux/phy.h
> +++ b/include/linux/phy.h
> @@ -377,6 +377,7 @@ struct phy_device {
> bool is_pseudo_fixed_link;
> bool has_fixups;
> bool suspended;
> + bool no_auto_carrier_off;
>
> enum phy_state state;
>
>
--
Florian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists