netdev - Re: MULTIPLE_TABLES and IP_ADVANCED

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHA+R7O2M_CW7TbVdsRMO+GBE0RwkctODHtYq+m3_-Zq11zn4A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 24 Nov 2015 10:43:33 -0800
From:	Cong Wang <cwang@...pensource.com>
To:	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: MULTIPLE_TABLES and IP_ADVANCED_ROUTER

On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 10:38 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven
<geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 7:10 PM, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
>> From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
>> Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2015 11:03:18 +0100
>>
>>> Is there a reason why IP_MULTIPLE_TABLES and
>>> IP_MROUTE_MULTIPLE_TABLES depend on IP_ADVANCED_ROUTER, while their
>>> IPV6 counterparts don't?
>>
>> It's just another thing that happened to diverge over time, there is
>> no real reason.
>
> So should the dependencies be added for IPv6, or removed for IPv4?

David's point is we should just leave it as it is.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html