[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20151124.163025.1551408934471757005.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 16:30:25 -0500 (EST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: herbert@...dor.apana.org.au
Cc: peterz@...radead.org, tatsu@...jp.nec.com, mingo@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
jolsa@...hat.com, eric.dumazet@...il.com
Subject: Re: net: Generalise wq_has_sleeper helper
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 13:54:23 +0800
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 05:48:29PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
>>
>> BTW, the networking folks found this years ago and even added
>> helpers to deal with this. See for example wq_has_sleeper in
>> include/net/sock.h. It would be good if we can move some of
>> those helpers into wait.h instead.
>
> Here is a patch against net-next which makes the wq_has_sleeper
> helper available to non-next users:
>
> ---8<---
> The memory barrier in the helper wq_has_sleeper is needed by just
> about every user of waitqueue_active. This patch generalises it
> by making it take a wait_queue_head_t directly. The existing
> helper is renamed to skwq_has_sleeper.
>
> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
I'm fine with wherever this patch goes. Herbert is there any
particular tree where it'll facilitate another user quickest?
Or should I just toss it into net-next?
Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists