[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20151125.113035.637118798972617751.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 11:30:35 -0500 (EST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: hannes@...xchg.org
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, vdavydov@...tuozzo.com, mhocko@...e.cz,
tj@...nel.org, eric.dumazet@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/13] mm: memcontrol: account socket memory in unified
hierarchy memory controller
From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 16:58:44 -0500
> Socket memory can be a significant share of overall memory consumed by
> common workloads. In order to provide reasonable resource isolation in
> the unified hierarchy, this type of memory needs to be included in the
> tracking/accounting of a cgroup under active memory resource control.
>
> Overhead is only incurred when a non-root control group is created AND
> the memory controller is instructed to track and account the memory
> footprint of that group. cgroup.memory=nosocket can be specified on
> the boot commandline to override any runtime configuration and
> forcibly exclude socket memory from active memory resource control.
>
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists