| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20151125.113602.515197415619267019.davem@davemloft.net> Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 11:36:02 -0500 (EST) From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> To: joe@...ches.com Cc: f.fainelli@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] MAINTAINERS: PHY: Change maintainer to reviewer From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 17:04:11 -0800 > On Tue, 2015-11-24 at 15:29 -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote: >> Now that there is a reviewer role, add myself as reviewer since the PHY >> library code is maintained via the networking tree. > > [] > >> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > [] >> @@ -4195,7 +4195,7 @@ F: include/linux/netfilter_bridge/ >> F:> > net/bridge/ >> >> ETHERNET PHY LIBRARY >> -M: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com> >> +R: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com> >> L: netdev@...r.kernel.org >> S: Maintained >> F: include/linux/phy.h > > Just because the upstream path is not a tree you > manage doesn't mean you aren't a maintainer. > > I think the status should be something other than > "Maintained" if you are not the maintainer. Yeah, I kinda agree, Florian you are pretty much the de-facto maintainer and I usually wait for you to review any PHY library changes before applying them unless they are _really_ obvious. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists