| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 10:07:25 -0800 From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com> To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, joe@...ches.com CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] MAINTAINERS: PHY: Change maintainer to reviewer On 25/11/15 08:36, David Miller wrote: > From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> > Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 17:04:11 -0800 > >> On Tue, 2015-11-24 at 15:29 -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote: >>> Now that there is a reviewer role, add myself as reviewer since the PHY >>> library code is maintained via the networking tree. >> >> [] >> >>> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS >> [] >>> @@ -4195,7 +4195,7 @@ F: include/linux/netfilter_bridge/ >>> F:> > net/bridge/ >>> >>> ETHERNET PHY LIBRARY >>> -M: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com> >>> +R: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com> >>> L: netdev@...r.kernel.org >>> S: Maintained >>> F: include/linux/phy.h >> >> Just because the upstream path is not a tree you >> manage doesn't mean you aren't a maintainer. >> >> I think the status should be something other than >> "Maintained" if you are not the maintainer. > > Yeah, I kinda agree, Florian you are pretty much the de-facto > maintainer and I usually wait for you to review any PHY library > changes before applying them unless they are _really_ obvious. Sounds good, let's drop this patch then, thanks! -- Florian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists