netdev - Re: [patch net-next 24/26] mlxsw: spectrum: Implement LAG port join/leave

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 2 Dec 2015 16:28:29 +0100
From:	Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To:	Andy Gospodarek <gospo@...ulusnetworks.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, idosch@...lanox.com,
	eladr@...lanox.com, yotamg@...lanox.com, ogerlitz@...lanox.com
Subject: Re: [patch net-next 24/26] mlxsw: spectrum: Implement LAG port
 join/leave

Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 03:26:27PM CET, gospo@...ulusnetworks.com wrote:
>On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 03:10:22PM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 03:01:32PM CET, gospo@...ulusnetworks.com wrote:
>> >On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 02:49:02PM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> >> From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>
>> >> 
>> >> Implement basic procedures for joining/leaving port to/from LAG. That
>> >> includes HW setup of collector, core LAG mapping setup.
>> >> 
>> >[...]
>> >> @@ -1937,6 +2153,18 @@ static int mlxsw_sp_netdevice_event(struct notifier_block *unused,
>> >>  				mlxsw_sp_port->bridged = 0;
>> >>  				mlxsw_sp_master_bridge_dec(mlxsw_sp, upper_dev);
>> >>  			}
>> >> +		} else if (netif_is_lag_master(upper_dev)) {
>> >> +			if (info->linking) {
>> >> +				err = mlxsw_sp_port_lag_join(mlxsw_sp_port,
>> >> +							     upper_dev);
>> >> +				if (err)
>> >> +					netdev_err(dev, "Failed to join link aggregation\n");
>> >> +			} else {
>> >> +				err = mlxsw_sp_port_lag_leave(mlxsw_sp_port,
>> >> +							      upper_dev);
>> >> +				if (err)
>> >> +					netdev_err(dev, "Failed to leave link aggregation\n");
>> >> +			}
>> >>  		}
>> >>  		break;
>> >>  	}
>> >
>> >If I'm reading this correctly, moving an offloaded port into a bond/team
>> >or changing configuration options isn't synchronous.  It seems like the
>> >lack of immediate feedback to the caller is not desired.
>> 
>> This is actually something we have prepared and wanted to push as a
>> follow-up. To allow driver to return NOTIBY_BAD here and let changeupper
>> to fail back to bond/team code.
>
>I would like to see these additional changes proposed as part of this
>set.  The failure case needs to be synchronous and users need to be
>notified immediately to consider this feature complete.
>

Okay, will add.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html