[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151204180610.51732e36@griffin>
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2015 18:06:10 +0100
From: Jiri Benc <jbenc@...hat.com>
To: Tom Herbert <tom@...bertland.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net] vxlan: fix incorrect RCO bit in VXLAN header
On Fri, 4 Dec 2015 08:43:59 -0800, Tom Herbert wrote:
> What a mess VXLAN has become. There are no guidelines or order in
> defining these reserved bits! If anyone is looking to do some work in
> encapsulation please consider bringing up VXLAN-GPE/NSH in the stack,
> hopefully that world will be better....
I'm actually working right now on VXLAN-GPE implementation (and tons of
cleanups in the vxlan code) which is the reason I noticed this bug.
> Acked-by: Tom Herbert <tom@...bertland.com>
Thanks. David, as this was submitted as RFC, should I resubmit?
Provided that you're okay with the patch, of course; it changes the
on-wire format which should not be taken lightly, even though the
current behavior is incorrect.
Jiri
--
Jiri Benc
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists