netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH net] vxlan: fix incorrect RCO bit in VXLAN header

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 4 Dec 2015 18:06:10 +0100
From:	Jiri Benc <jbenc@...hat.com>
To:	Tom Herbert <tom@...bertland.com>
Cc:	Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net] vxlan: fix incorrect RCO bit in VXLAN header

On Fri, 4 Dec 2015 08:43:59 -0800, Tom Herbert wrote:
> What a mess VXLAN has become. There are no guidelines or order in
> defining these reserved bits! If anyone is looking to do some work in
> encapsulation please consider bringing up VXLAN-GPE/NSH in the stack,
> hopefully that world will be better....

I'm actually working right now on VXLAN-GPE implementation (and tons of
cleanups in the vxlan code) which is the reason I noticed this bug.

> Acked-by: Tom Herbert <tom@...bertland.com>

Thanks. David, as this was submitted as RFC, should I resubmit?
Provided that you're okay with the patch, of course; it changes the
on-wire format which should not be taken lightly, even though the
current behavior is incorrect.

 Jiri

-- 
Jiri Benc
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html