[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALx6S34_MazNmhACWBnVYFzXT9qZPLy2CZK3BBhP8RJzoHYo4w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2015 09:13:28 -0800
From: Tom Herbert <tom@...bertland.com>
To: Jiri Benc <jbenc@...hat.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net] vxlan: fix incorrect RCO bit in VXLAN header
On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 9:06 AM, Jiri Benc <jbenc@...hat.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Dec 2015 08:43:59 -0800, Tom Herbert wrote:
>> What a mess VXLAN has become. There are no guidelines or order in
>> defining these reserved bits! If anyone is looking to do some work in
>> encapsulation please consider bringing up VXLAN-GPE/NSH in the stack,
>> hopefully that world will be better....
>
> I'm actually working right now on VXLAN-GPE implementation (and tons of
> cleanups in the vxlan code) which is the reason I noticed this bug.
>
That's awesome! One favor, can you make sure VXLAN-GPE works with IPv6
from the start. :-)
Also, I'll need to spin an I-D for RCO in VXLAN-GPE. Do you see any
reason to use a different bit for it?
Tom
>> Acked-by: Tom Herbert <tom@...bertland.com>
>
> Thanks. David, as this was submitted as RFC, should I resubmit?
> Provided that you're okay with the patch, of course; it changes the
> on-wire format which should not be taken lightly, even though the
> current behavior is incorrect.
>
> Jiri
>
> --
> Jiri Benc
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists