| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1449435784.25029.50.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Sun, 06 Dec 2015 13:03:04 -0800
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: dwilder@...ibm.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, predeep@...ibm.com, mjtarsel@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: Double free of dst_entry in ipv4_dst_destroy()
On Sun, 2015-12-06 at 13:26 -0500, dwilder@...ibm.com wrote:
> Hi-
>
> I am seeing a crash on a distro V4.2.3 kernel caused by a double
> release of a dst_entry. In ipv4_dst_destroy() the call to
> list_empty() finds a poisoned next pointer, indicating the dst_entry
> has already been removed from the list and freed. The crash occurs
> 18 to 24 hours into a run of a network stress exerciser.
>
> [172135.963496] Unable to handle kernel paging request for data at
> address 0x00100108 << poison value
> [172135.963913] Faulting instruction address: 0xc00000000097f5ac
> [172135.964184] Oops: Kernel access of bad area, sig: 11 [#1]
> [172135.964327] SMP NR_CPUS=2048 NUMA PowerNV
> [172135.964649] Modules linked in: iptable_filter ip_tables x_tables
> bnx2x cxlflash cxl mdio ses libcrc32c enclosure uio_pdrv_genirq uio
> powernv_rng sunrpc autofs4 ipr
> [172135.965403] CPU: 51 PID: 65452 Comm: hxecpu Tainted: G W
> 4.2.3 #2
> [172135.965482] task: c000001d8a370ff0 ti: c000001e2d57c000 task.ti:
> c000001e2d57c000
> [172135.965564] NIP: c00000000097f5ac LR: c00000000097f59c CTR:
> 0000000000000000
> [172135.965664] REGS: c000001e2d57f8e0 TRAP: 0300 Tainted: G
> W (4.2.3)
> [172135.965782] MSR: 9000000000009033 <SF,HV,EE,ME,IR,DR,RI,LE> CR:
> 22322442 XER: 00000000
> [172135.966033] CFAR: c000000000008468 DAR: 0000000000100108 DSISR:
> 42000000 SOFTE: 1
> GPR00: c00000000097f59c c000001e2d57fb60
> c00000000151ad00 c000001e504de300
> GPR04: 0000000000000001 0000000000000000
> c000001fff8af370 c00000000141ad00
> GPR08: c0000000016aad00 0000000000200200
> 0000000000100100 3d7473696c5f6465
> GPR12: 6531303030303063 c000000007b5e480
> 0000000000000012 0000000000000001
> GPR16: 0000000000000000 c000000001431280
> c000000000ad38f0 7fffffffffffffff
> GPR20: 0000000000000000 c000001e28caf000
> c000001e2d57c000 c000000001429b80
> GPR24: 000000000000000a 0000000000000000
> c000001e504ddb30 0000000000000000
> GPR28: 0000000000000000 c000001e2d57c000
> c000001e504de300 c000001e28caf000 <<< pointer to dst
> [172135.967772] NIP [c00000000097f5ac] ipv4_dst_destroy+0x8c/0xc0
> [172135.967921] LR [c00000000097f59c] ipv4_dst_destroy+0x7c/0xc0
> [172135.968076] Call Trace:
> [172135.968133] [c000001e2d57fb60] [c00000000097f59c]
> ipv4_dst_destroy+0x7c/0xc0 (unreliable)
> [172135.968306] [c000001e2d57fbd0] [c00000000093b8e0] dst_destroy+0xf0/0x1a0
> [172135.968452] [c000001e2d57fc10] [c00000000093bc68]
> dst_destroy_rcu+0x28/0x50
> [172135.968600] [c000001e2d57fc40] [c0000000001397a0]
> rcu_process_callbacks+0x340/0x6f0
> [172135.968768] [c000001e2d57fcf0] [c0000000000ba7d8] __do_softirq+0x188/0x3a0
> [172135.968913] [c000001e2d57fde0] [c0000000000bac68] irq_exit+0xc8/0x100
> [172135.969056] [c000001e2d57fe00] [c00000000001f734]
> timer_interrupt+0xa4/0xe0
> [172135.969223] [c000001e2d57fe30] [c000000000002714]
> decrementer_common+0x114/0x180
> [172135.969395] Instruction dump:
> [172135.969492] 7fe5fb78 38842968 7fc6f378 3863e580 4811c989 60000000
> 7fc3f378 481154c1
> [172135.969748] 60000000 e93f00b8 e95f00b0 7fc3f378 <f92a0008>
> f9490000 3d200010 61290100
> [172135.970009] ---[ end trace 34f3693ddc2d5aea ]---
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> I added a call to dump_stack() into dst_release() in an attempt to
> catch the two calls to dst_release().
>
> -- a/net/core/dst.c
> +++ b/net/core/dst.c
> @@ -307,6 +307,12 @@ void dst_release(struct dst_entry *dst)
> net_warn_ratelimited("%s: dst:%p refcnt:%d\n",
> __func__, dst, newrefcnt);
> if (!newrefcnt && unlikely(dst->flags & DST_NOCACHE))
> +
> + if (!list_empty(&rt->rt_uncached)) {
> + printk("%s: dst=%p\n",__func__,dst);
> + dump_stack();
> + }
> +
> call_rcu(&dst->rcu_head, dst_destroy_rcu);
> }
> }
>
> I got lucky and caught the following stack traces on my next run.
>
> [26211.699357] tcp_v4_do_rcv: sk=c000001d10a00000 skb=c000001d22c61d00
> dst=c000001d22c62500 sk->sk_rx_dst=c000001d22c62500
> [26211.699527] dst_release: dst=c000001d22c62500
> [26211.699626] CPU: 51 PID: 23317 Comm: hxecom Tainted: G W
> 4.2.3 #4
> [26211.699632] Call Trace:
> [26211.699678] [c000001cf0387440] [c000000000a9dcd4]
> dump_stack+0x90/0xbc (unreliable)
> [26211.699829] [c000001cf0387470] [c00000000093bf80] dst_release+0x110/0x120
> [26211.699875] [c000001cf03874e0] [c0000000009b4024] tcp_v4_do_rcv+0x4d4/0x4f0
> [26211.699979] [c000001cf0387580] [c0000000009b7834] tcp_v4_rcv+0xb74/0xb90
> [26211.700027] [c000001cf0387660] [c000000000984bb8]
> ip_local_deliver_finish+0x178/0x350
> [26211.700123] [c000001cf03876b0] [c0000000009853bc]
> ip_local_deliver+0x4c/0x120
> [26211.700181] [c000001cf0387720] [c000000000984eb4] ip_rcv_finish+0x124/0x420
> [26211.700255] [c000001cf03877a0] [c0000000009857a4] ip_rcv+0x314/0x440
> [26211.700312] [c000001cf0387830] [c00000000092b094]
> __netif_receive_skb_core+0xa14/0xd60
> [26211.700334] [c000001cf0387910] [c00000000092e924]
> netif_receive_skb_internal+0x34/0xd0
> [26211.700370] [c000001cf0387950] [c00000000092fa5c]
> napi_gro_receive+0xec/0x1b0
> [26211.700449] [c000001cf0387990] [d0000000165a59f0]
> bnx2x_rx_int+0x1450/0x1700 [bnx2x]
> [26211.700524] [c000001cf0387b30] [d0000000165a6580]
> bnx2x_poll+0x310/0x440 [bnx2x]
> [26211.700551] [c000001cf0387be0] [c00000000092f0dc] net_rx_action+0x2dc/0x470
> [26211.700565] [c000001cf0387cf0] [c0000000000ba7d8] __do_softirq+0x188/0x3a0
> [26211.700629] [c000001cf0387de0] [c0000000000bac68] irq_exit+0xc8/0x100
> [26211.700657] [c000001cf0387e00] [c00000000001f734] timer_interrupt+0xa4/0xe0
> [26211.700664] [c000001cf0387e30] [c000000000002714]
> decrementer_common+0x114/0x180
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [26211.700709] tcp_v4_do_rcv: sk=c000001d10a00000 skb=c000001d22c61d00
> dst=c000001d22c62500 sk->sk_rx_dst=c000001d22c62500
> [26211.700713] dst_release: dst=c000001d22c62500
> [26211.700719] CPU: 34 PID: 23342 Comm: hxecom Tainted: G W
> 4.2.3 #4
> [26211.700726] Call Trace:
> [26211.700735] [c000001cf4a97920] [c000000000a9dcd4]
> dump_stack+0x90/0xbc (unreliable)
> [26211.700742] [c000001cf4a97950] [c00000000093bf80] dst_release+0x110/0x120
> [26211.700749] [c000001cf4a979c0] [c0000000009b4024] tcp_v4_do_rcv+0x4d4/0x4f0
> [26211.700759] [c000001cf4a97a60] [c00000000090c72c] release_sock+0xec/0x1e0
> [26211.700772] [c000001cf4a97ab0] [c000000000998b98] tcp_recvmsg+0x3f8/0xce0
> [26211.700778] [c000001cf4a97bd0] [c0000000009d31dc] inet_recvmsg+0x9c/0x110
> [26211.700785] [c000001cf4a97c30] [c000000000906d24] sock_recvmsg+0x84/0xb0
> [26211.700794] [c000001cf4a97c70] [c0000000009088ac] SyS_recvfrom+0xdc/0x1a0
> [26211.700802] [c000001cf4a97dc0] [c000000000909a38]
> SyS_socketcall+0x2d8/0x430
> [26211.700809] [c000001cf4a97e30] [c000000000009204] system_call+0x38/0xb4
>
> (Corresponding Oops message cut out for brevity, the double free
> occurred on dst_entry c000001d22c62500, same entry as in both the
> above traces.)
>
> This is what I think is happening:
>
> In the first thread tcp_v4_do_rcv() calls dst_release(), the reference
> count becomes zero scheduling a rcu callback of dst_destroy_rcu() and
> setting sk->sk_rx_dst = NULL.
>
> tcp_rcv_established() is called from tcp_v4_do_rcv(), finding
> sk->sk_rx_dst = NULL it re-referencing the same dst_entry from
> skb->_skb_refdst taking a reference, the reference count is now 1 .
> At this point dst_destroy_rcu() is scheduled to run against a
> dst_entry that has a reference count of 1!
>
demux code (tcp_v4_early_demux()) only works if we can always
set skb->dst to a (previously cached) dst, even with refcnt==0
Otherwise, we would need to always increment dst refcnt (and only if
refcnt is not 0), that would be quite expensive (2 additional atomic op
per input packet)
This means that dst_check() fails to notice the dst should not be reused
(once it is scheduled for destruction)
But then when later we promote a skb->dst to a refctounted one
(skb_dst_force(), we might make sure we abort the operation if __refcnt
== 0 ( and DST_NOCACHE is in dst->flags)
> The second thread (a user read) follows the same path calling
> dst_release() and scheduling a second callback for the same dst_entry
> eventually causing the crash when the callback runs.
>
> To test my theory I added the following check in tcp_v4_do_rcv().
>
> ---------------
> If the dst released is the same dst as in skb->refdst, skip the call
> to dst_release().
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
> index db00343..7f058f9 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
> @@ -1377,8 +1377,10 @@ int tcp_v4_do_rcv(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
> if (dst) {
> if (inet_sk(sk)->rx_dst_ifindex != skb->skb_iif ||
> !dst->ops->check(dst, 0)) {
> - dst_release(dst);
> - sk->sk_rx_dst = NULL;
> + if (dst != skb_dst(skb)) {
> + dst_release(dst);
> + sk->sk_rx_dst = NULL;
> + }
> }
> }
> tcp_rcv_established(sk, skb, tcp_hdr(skb), skb->len);
>
>
> With this change the test has run for 48 hours with out a crash. I
> don't fully understand the conditions that must occur to set this up,
> therefor this may be a workaround not a fix. What are your thoughts?
Well, sure, not doing this avoid to trigger the fault, but does not find
root cause.
Keeping the obsolete dst in socket cache is wrong.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists