[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151208145410.GC3598@tuxdriver.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 09:54:11 -0500
From: "John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>
To: Pravin B Shelar <pshelar@...ira.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] geneve: Fix IPv6 xmit stats update.
On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 07:17:30PM -0800, Pravin B Shelar wrote:
> Call to iptunnel_xmit_stats() is not required after udp-tunnel6-xmit.
> By calling iptunnel_xmit_stats() results in incorrect device stats.
> Following patch drops this call.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pravin B Shelar <pshelar@...ira.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/geneve.c | 2 --
> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/geneve.c b/drivers/net/geneve.c
> index de5c30c..c2b79f5 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/geneve.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/geneve.c
> @@ -967,8 +967,6 @@ static netdev_tx_t geneve6_xmit_skb(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev,
> err = udp_tunnel6_xmit_skb(dst, gs6->sock->sk, skb, dev,
> &fl6.saddr, &fl6.daddr, prio, ttl,
> sport, geneve->dst_port, !udp_csum);
> -
> - iptunnel_xmit_stats(err, &dev->stats, dev->tstats);
> return NETDEV_TX_OK;
>
> tx_error:
So udp_tunnel_xmit_skb and udp_tunnel6_xmit_skb are different in this
regard? It seems so -- who knew? :-)
_Should_ they be different in this regard?
John
--
John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you
linville@...driver.com might be all we have. Be ready.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists