netdev - Re: [PATCH] net: take care of bonding in build_skb_flow

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20160106.011835.39198953316515142.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Wed, 06 Jan 2016 01:18:35 -0500 (EST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	wen.gang.wang@...cle.com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: take care of bonding in build_skb_flow_key

From: Wengang Wang <wen.gang.wang@...cle.com>
Date: Wed,  6 Jan 2016 13:49:28 +0800

> @@ -523,11 +523,20 @@ static void build_skb_flow_key(struct flowi4 *fl4, const struct sk_buff *skb,
>  			       const struct sock *sk)
>  {
>  	const struct iphdr *iph = ip_hdr(skb);
> -	int oif = skb->dev->ifindex;
> +	int oif;
> +	struct net_device *master = NULL;
> +
>  	u8 tos = RT_TOS(iph->tos);
>  	u8 prot = iph->protocol;
>  	u32 mark = skb->mark;
>  

Please fix the stlye of these variable declarations:

1) Order them from longest line to shortest line, also known
   as "reverse christmas tree" layout.

2) Do not add an empty line in the middle of these variable
   declarations.

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html