lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 12 Jan 2016 15:03:39 +0800
From:	"Wangnan (F)" <>
To:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <>
CC:	<>, <>,
	<>, <>,
	<>, Jiri Olsa <>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <>,
	Namhyung Kim <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/53] perf tools: Prevent calling machine__delete() on
 non-allocated machine

On 2016/1/11 23:42, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 01:48:04PM +0000, Wang Nan escreveu:
>> To prevent futher commits calling machine__delete() on non-allocated
>> 'struct machine' (which would cause memory corruption), this patch
>> enforces machine__init(), record whether a machine structure is
>> dynamically allocated or not, and warn if machine__delete() is called
>> on incorrect object.
> Not sure on this one, I think I voiced this before, this seems like
> something to be tested using some static analysis tool or even checking
> if the address for the struct hitting machine__delete() is from malloc
> or not.
> I.e. if we do it here, we may have to do it to any other struct where we
> allocate it in the stack or via malloc, and furthermore there are cases
> where we embed a struct in another, when we would free just the main
> struct but not the second, embedded one, that would need just calling
> foo__exit() and not foo__delete().
> - Arnaldo
OK. Let's drop this one.

Thank you.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists