[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5694A838.6030307@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 15:16:08 +0800
From: "Wangnan (F)" <wangnan0@...wei.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <pi3orama@....com>,
<lizefan@...wei.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<davem@...emloft.net>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/53] perf tools: Test correct path of perf in build-test
On 2016/1/12 6:39, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 07:39:04PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
>> Em Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 07:06:18PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
>>> Em Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 12:24:56PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
>>>> Em Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 01:47:56PM +0000, Wang Nan escreveu:
>>>>> If an 'O' is passed to 'make build-test', many 'test -x' and 'test -f'
>>>>> will fail because perf resides in a different directory. Fix this by
>>>>> computing PERF_OUT according to 'O' and test correct output files.
>>>>> For make_kernelsrc and make_kernelsrc_tools, set KBUILD_OUTPUT_DIR
>>>>> instead because the path is different from others ($(O)/perf vs
>>>>> $(O)/tools/perf).
>>>> Ok, applying up to this patch I now manage to almost cleanly build it using O=,
>>>> see below, but seems that we have some race, as not all tests end up producing
>>>> such warnings.
>>>>
>>>> [acme@...icio linux]$ rm -rf /tmp/build/perf ; mkdir -p /tmp/build/perf ; make O=/tmp/build/perf -C tools/perf build-test
>>>> make: Entering directory `/home/acme/git/linux/tools/perf'
>>>> Testing Makefile
>>>> - make_no_libperl: cd . && make -f Makefile DESTDIR=/tmp/tmp.m1nXBMqhSA NO_LIBPERL=1
>>>> find: ‘/tmp/build/perf/util/trace-event-scripting.o’: No such file or directory
This can happen when you parallelly run find and rm on one directory.
However,
I've never seen this message in build-test before.
>>> Well, it is happening even without O=:
>> So I removed a few patches and those aren't appearing anymore, please
>> take a look at my perf/core branch, running build-test on a few machines
>> now, will push soon.
>>
>> My hunch is that build-test has issues with parallel builds, but I'm not
>> sure...
>
> Good:
>
> - make_perf_o_O: cd . && make -f Makefile O=/tmp/tmp.oLeg8aUaOo DESTDIR=/tmp/tmp.16WP4HTQJs perf.o
> - make_util_pmu_bison_o_O: cd . && make -f Makefile O=/tmp/tmp.xNRV0pCXfD DESTDIR=/tmp/tmp.8dyU9uEbHe util/pmu-bison.o
> - make_no_libdw_dwarf_unwind_O: cd . && make -f Makefile O=/tmp/tmp.pHH4HExHcH DESTDIR=/tmp/tmp.Wo0m8fF5cp NO_LIBDW_DWARF_UNWIND=1
> - make_no_demangle_O: cd . && make -f Makefile O=/tmp/tmp.yWNsd4jOsI DESTDIR=/tmp/tmp.Q7eA4kCvwL NO_DEMANGLE=1
> - tarpkg: ./tests/perf-targz-src-pkg .
> - make -C <kernelsrc> tools/perf
> - make -C <kernelsrc>/tools perf
> OK
Glad to see this.
Thank you.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists