netdev - Re: [PATCH 17/53] perf test: Improve bp

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160112092129.GA2187@krava.brq.redhat.com>
Date:	Tue, 12 Jan 2016 10:21:29 +0100
From:	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc:	Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	pi3orama@....com, lizefan@...wei.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	davem@...emloft.net, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/53] perf test: Improve bp_signal

On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 06:37:29PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 01:48:08PM +0000, Wang Nan escreveu:
> > Will Deacon [1] has some question on patch [2]. This patch improves
> > test__bp_signal so we can test:
> > 
> >  1. A watchpoint and a breakpoint that fire on the same instruction
> >  2. Nested signals
> > 
> > Test result:
> > 
> >  On x86_64 and ARM64 (result are similar with patch [2] on ARM64):
> > 
> >  # ./perf test -v signal
> >  17: Test breakpoint overflow signal handler                  :
> >  --- start ---
> >  test child forked, pid 10213
> >  count1 1, count2 3, count3 2, overflow 3, overflows_2 3
> >  test child finished with 0
> >  ---- end ----
> >  Test breakpoint overflow signal handler: Ok
> > 
> > So at least 2 cases Will doubted are handled correctly.
> > 
> > [1] http://lkml.kernel.org/g/20160104165535.GI1616@arm.com
> > [2] http://lkml.kernel.org/g/1450921362-198371-1-git-send-email-wangnan0@huawei.com
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>
> > Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
> 
> Will, are you ok with this one? Can I have an Acked-by or better,
> Tested-by for the AARCH64 base?
> 
> IIRC Jiri made some comment about this one?

I thought I acked this one.. all comments were addresses, so:

Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>

thanks,
jirka