netdev - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160112091102.GA12607@colbert.idosch.org>
Date:	Tue, 12 Jan 2016 11:11:02 +0200
From:	Ido Schimmel <idosch@...lanox.com>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
CC:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-next@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree

Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 04:15:05AM IST, sfr@...b.auug.org.au wrote:

Hi Stephen,

>Hi all,
>
>Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got a conflict in:
>
>  drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_switchdev.c
>
>between commit:
>
>  366ce6031529 ("mlxsw: spectrum: Add FDB lock to prevent session interleaving")
>
>from the net tree and commit:
>
>  54a732018d8e ("mlxsw: spectrum: Adjust switchdev ops for VLAN devices")
>
>from the net-next tree.
>
>I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
>is required).
>
>-- 
>Cheers,
>Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au
>
>diff --cc drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_switchdev.c
>index 80e266063aee,4cdc18e72222..000000000000
>--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_switchdev.c
>+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_switchdev.c
>@@@ -650,7 -1057,14 +1057,15 @@@ static int mlxsw_sp_port_fdb_dump(struc
>  	if (!sfd_pl)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  
> +	mutex_lock(&mlxsw_sp_port->mlxsw_sp->fdb_lock);

The lock can be moved further down, just before mlxsw_reg_sfd_pack.
Other than that everything looks fine. Thank you!

>+ 	if (mlxsw_sp_port_is_vport(mlxsw_sp_port)) {
>+ 		u16 tmp;
>+ 
>+ 		tmp = mlxsw_sp_vport_vfid_get(mlxsw_sp_port);
>+ 		vport_fid = mlxsw_sp_vfid_to_fid(tmp);
>+ 		vport_vid = mlxsw_sp_vport_vid_get(mlxsw_sp_port);
>+ 	}
>+ 
>  	mlxsw_reg_sfd_pack(sfd_pl, MLXSW_REG_SFD_OP_QUERY_DUMP, 0);
>  	do {
>  		mlxsw_reg_sfd_num_rec_set(sfd_pl, MLXSW_REG_SFD_REC_MAX_COUNT);