[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87618083B2453E4A8714035B62D679925051E54D@FMSMSX105.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 16:33:37 +0000
From: "Tantilov, Emil S" <emil.s.tantilov@...el.com>
To: "zyjzyj2000@...il.com" <zyjzyj2000@...il.com>,
"mkubecek@...e.cz" <mkubecek@...e.cz>,
"vfalico@...il.com" <vfalico@...il.com>,
"gospo@...ulusnetworks.com" <gospo@...ulusnetworks.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"Shteinbock, Boris (Wind River)" <boris.shteinbock@...driver.com>,
"jay.vosburgh@...onical.com" <jay.vosburgh@...onical.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/1] bonding: Use notifiers for slave link state
detection
>-----Original Message-----
>From: zyjzyj2000@...il.com [mailto:zyjzyj2000@...il.com]
>Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2016 2:16 AM
>To: zyjzyj2000@...il.com; mkubecek@...e.cz; vfalico@...il.com;
>gospo@...ulusnetworks.com; netdev@...r.kernel.org; Shteinbock, Boris (Wind
>River); jay.vosburgh@...onical.com; Tantilov, Emil S
>Subject: [PATCH 1/1] bonding: Use notifiers for slave link state detection
>
>
>Hi, Jay && Emil
>
>Thanks for your hard work. I forget to send this patch to you. Please help
>to review. Thanks a lot.
>
>I think the similar patch is needed in linux kernel 4.4. As such, based on
>linux kernel 4.4, I made this patch. Please comment.
The patch you are referring to has not been accepted in net-next yet.
If/when that happens you can request it to be ported to the stable tree.
Last version I tested seemed to work OK, but Jay mentioned some RCU warnings and
I was expecting a follow up on it.
Thanks,
Emil
Powered by blists - more mailing lists