netdev - RE: [PATCH 1/1] bonding: Use notifiers for slave link state detection

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87618083B2453E4A8714035B62D679925051F62B@FMSMSX105.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date:	Mon, 25 Jan 2016 18:37:17 +0000
From:	"Tantilov, Emil S" <emil.s.tantilov@...el.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	"zyjzyj2000@...il.com" <zyjzyj2000@...il.com>,
	"mkubecek@...e.cz" <mkubecek@...e.cz>,
	"vfalico@...il.com" <vfalico@...il.com>,
	"gospo@...ulusnetworks.com" <gospo@...ulusnetworks.com>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Shteinbock, Boris (Wind River)" <boris.shteinbock@...driver.com>,
	"jay.vosburgh@...onical.com" <jay.vosburgh@...onical.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/1] bonding: Use notifiers for slave link state
 detection

>-----Original Message-----
>From: David Miller [mailto:davem@...emloft.net]
>Sent: Monday, January 25, 2016 10:00 AM
>To: Tantilov, Emil S
>Cc: zyjzyj2000@...il.com; mkubecek@...e.cz; vfalico@...il.com;
>gospo@...ulusnetworks.com; netdev@...r.kernel.org; Shteinbock, Boris (Wind
>River); jay.vosburgh@...onical.com
>Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] bonding: Use notifiers for slave link state
>detection
>
>From: "Tantilov, Emil S" <emil.s.tantilov@...el.com>
>Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 16:33:37 +0000
>
>> The patch you are referring to has not been accepted in net-next yet.
>> If/when that happens you can request it to be ported to the stable tree.
>
>Wrong.
>
>If you want a patch to get submitted to stable, it must be appropriate for
>and you must target it to 'net', not 'net-next'.

Yeah that came out wrong. I was just trying to point out that this patch
is a port to 4.4 kernel of a test patch from Jay that hasn't even gotten
into the net/net-next trees yet.

Thanks,
Emil