netdev - Re: [BISECTED] v4.5-rc1 phylib regression

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160127001502.GA11317@lunn.ch>
Date:	Wed, 27 Jan 2016 01:15:02 +0100
From:	Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc:	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
	Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@...ia.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [BISECTED] v4.5-rc1 phylib regression

On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 03:54:13PM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 26/01/16 14:09, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> >>> Nope, not an option. Only a small number of DTB actually use c22 or
> >>> c45. The majority of devices have no compatible at all. Why should
> >>> they, the binding documentation says it is optional!
> >>
> >> So one thing that can be done is to just have a whitelist in the
> >> driver that we add the known phy compatibles to, with a nice comment
> >> above that this should only be for legacy device trees.
> > 
> > So you mean drivers/of/of_mdio.c:of_mdiobus_child_is_phy()
> > has a white list like:
> > 
> > "brcm,40nm-ephy"
> > "marvell,88E1111", 
> > "marvell,88e1116",
> > "marvell,88e1118",
> > "marvell,88e1149r",
> > "marvell,88e1310",
> > "marvell,88E1510",
> > "marvell,88E1514",
> > "moxa,moxart-rtl8201cp",
> > 
> > Yes, that would work.
> > 
> > We should also update the binding documentation to limit what is legal
> > in the compatible string.
> 
> Agreed, and while at it, take the opportunity to make the compatible
> string clause 22/45 mandatory properties so we do not multiply the
> whitelist.

Hi Florian

I just posted the whitelist code.

Making clause 22/45 mandatory is going further than a fix. So i've
left this out for the moment. We can add it to net-next later.

     Andrew