[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56A80725.1070808@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 15:54:13 -0800
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
CC: Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@...ia.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [BISECTED] v4.5-rc1 phylib regression
On 26/01/16 14:09, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>>> Nope, not an option. Only a small number of DTB actually use c22 or
>>> c45. The majority of devices have no compatible at all. Why should
>>> they, the binding documentation says it is optional!
>>
>> So one thing that can be done is to just have a whitelist in the
>> driver that we add the known phy compatibles to, with a nice comment
>> above that this should only be for legacy device trees.
>
> So you mean drivers/of/of_mdio.c:of_mdiobus_child_is_phy()
> has a white list like:
>
> "brcm,40nm-ephy"
> "marvell,88E1111",
> "marvell,88e1116",
> "marvell,88e1118",
> "marvell,88e1149r",
> "marvell,88e1310",
> "marvell,88E1510",
> "marvell,88E1514",
> "moxa,moxart-rtl8201cp",
>
> Yes, that would work.
>
> We should also update the binding documentation to limit what is legal
> in the compatible string.
Agreed, and while at it, take the opportunity to make the compatible
string clause 22/45 mandatory properties so we do not multiply the
whitelist.
Thanks!
--
Florian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists