[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160126220924.GK27473@lunn.ch>
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 23:09:24 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@...ia.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [BISECTED] v4.5-rc1 phylib regression
> > Nope, not an option. Only a small number of DTB actually use c22 or
> > c45. The majority of devices have no compatible at all. Why should
> > they, the binding documentation says it is optional!
>
> So one thing that can be done is to just have a whitelist in the
> driver that we add the known phy compatibles to, with a nice comment
> above that this should only be for legacy device trees.
So you mean drivers/of/of_mdio.c:of_mdiobus_child_is_phy()
has a white list like:
"brcm,40nm-ephy"
"marvell,88E1111",
"marvell,88e1116",
"marvell,88e1118",
"marvell,88e1149r",
"marvell,88e1310",
"marvell,88E1510",
"marvell,88E1514",
"moxa,moxart-rtl8201cp",
Yes, that would work.
We should also update the binding documentation to limit what is legal
in the compatible string.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists