netdev - Re: [PATCH net] ipv4: early demux should be aware of fragments

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1454080926.7627.49.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date:	Fri, 29 Jan 2016 07:22:06 -0800
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	joe@....org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, fw@...len.de,
	hannes@...essinduktion.org, pshelar@....org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] ipv4: early demux should be aware of fragments

On Wed, 2016-01-27 at 17:02 -0500, David Miller wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
> Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 16:59:42 -0800
> 
> > From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> > 
> > We should not assume a valid protocol header is present,
> > as this is not the case for IPv4 fragments.
> > 
> > Lets avoid extra cache line misses and potential bugs
> > if we actually find a socket and incorrectly uses its dst.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> 
> Applied, thanks.

David, I do not see this patch in net tree ?

Thanks !