[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAM_iQpVWpF_QZwORkcumw7=awVXQQ4SqGrymj7aSd5fGSyrddg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2016 10:21:21 -0800
From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: Julian Calaby <julian.calaby@...il.com>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
linux-wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
Lauro Ramos Venancio <lauro.venancio@...nbossa.org>,
Aloisio Almeida Jr <aloisio.almeida@...nbossa.org>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND net] nfc: use GFP_USER for user-controlled kmalloc
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 1:05 PM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-01-27 at 11:50 -0800, Cong Wang wrote:
>
>> Hmm? I think nfc_llcp_send_ui_frame() needs to do some fragmention
>> with this temporary memory, or you are saying msg_iter has some
>> API available to seek the pointer? Even if so, it doesn't look like
>> suitable for -stable.
>>
>
> memcpy_from_msg(msg_data, msg, len) will overwrite the msg_data with len
> bytes, or return an error.
>
> So prior msg_data content does not matter.
>
> kzalloc() before a memset() or memcpy() sounds defensive programming,
> kmalloc() is a bit faster.
Oh, you mean s/kzalloc/kmalloc/, I thought you mean s/kzalloc//. ;)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists