netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] hv_netvsc: Increase delay for RNDIS_STATUS_NETWORK

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87si1ax7t9.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com>
Date:	Wed, 03 Feb 2016 14:05:54 +0100
From:	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
To:	Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>
Cc:	davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, kys@...rosoft.com,
	olaf@...fle.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	driverdev-devel@...uxdriverproject.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] hv_netvsc: Increase delay for RNDIS_STATUS_NETWORK_CHANGE

Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com> writes:

> We simulates a link down period for RNDIS_STATUS_NETWORK_CHANGE message to
> trigger DHCP renew. User daemons may need multiple seconds to trigger the
> link down event. (e.g. ifplugd: 5sec, network-manager: 4sec.) So update
> this link down period to 10 sec to properly trigger DHCP renew.
>

I probably don't follow: why do we need sucha a delay? If (with real
hardware) you plug network cable out and in one second you plug it in
you'll get DHCP renewed, right?

When I introduced RNDIS_STATUS_NETWORK_CHANGE handling by emulating a
pair of up/down events I put 2 second delay to make link_watch happy (as
we only handle 1 event per second there) but 10 seconds sounds to much
to me.

> Signed-off-by: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/hyperv/netvsc_drv.c |   10 ++++++++--
>  1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/hyperv/netvsc_drv.c b/drivers/net/hyperv/netvsc_drv.c
> index 1d3a665..6f23973 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/hyperv/netvsc_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/hyperv/netvsc_drv.c
> @@ -43,6 +43,8 @@
>
>  #define RING_SIZE_MIN 64
>  #define LINKCHANGE_INT (2 * HZ)
> +/* Extra delay for RNDIS_STATUS_NETWORK_CHANGE: */
> +#define LINKCHANGE_DELAY (8 * HZ)
>  static int ring_size = 128;
>  module_param(ring_size, int, S_IRUGO);
>  MODULE_PARM_DESC(ring_size, "Ring buffer size (# of pages)");
> @@ -964,6 +966,7 @@ static void netvsc_link_change(struct work_struct *w)
>  		return;
>  	}
>  	ndev_ctx->last_reconfig = jiffies;
> +	delay = LINKCHANGE_INT;
>
>  	spin_lock_irqsave(&ndev_ctx->lock, flags);
>  	if (!list_empty(&ndev_ctx->reconfig_events)) {
> @@ -1009,8 +1012,11 @@ static void netvsc_link_change(struct work_struct *w)
>  			netif_tx_stop_all_queues(net);
>  			event->event = RNDIS_STATUS_MEDIA_CONNECT;
>  			spin_lock_irqsave(&ndev_ctx->lock, flags);
> -			list_add_tail(&event->list, &ndev_ctx->reconfig_events);
> +			list_add(&event->list, &ndev_ctx->reconfig_events);

Why? Adding to tail was here to not screw the order of events...

>  			spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ndev_ctx->lock, flags);
> +
> +			ndev_ctx->last_reconfig += LINKCHANGE_DELAY;
> +			delay = LINKCHANGE_INT + LINKCHANGE_DELAY;
>  			reschedule = true;
>  		}
>  		break;
> @@ -1025,7 +1031,7 @@ static void netvsc_link_change(struct work_struct *w)
>  	 * second, handle next reconfig event in 2 seconds.
>  	 */
>  	if (reschedule)
> -		schedule_delayed_work(&ndev_ctx->dwork, LINKCHANGE_INT);
> +		schedule_delayed_work(&ndev_ctx->dwork, delay);
>  }
>
>  static void netvsc_free_netdev(struct net_device *netdev)

-- 
  Vitaly