[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160203143133.1b70bcb5@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 14:31:33 +0100
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Cc: brouer@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
idosch@...lanox.com, eladr@...lanox.com, yotamg@...lanox.com,
ogerlitz@...lanox.com, yishaih@...lanox.com, dledford@...hat.com,
sean.hefty@...el.com, hal.rosenstock@...il.com,
eugenia@...lanox.com, roopa@...ulusnetworks.com,
nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com, hadarh@...lanox.com, jhs@...atatu.com,
john.fastabend@...il.com, jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com,
jbenc@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [patch net-next RFC 0/6] Introduce devlink interface and first
drivers to use it
On Wed, 3 Feb 2016 11:47:56 +0100
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us> wrote:
> From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>
>
> There a is need for some userspace API that would allow to expose things
> that are not directly related to any device class like net_device of
> ib_device, but rather chip-wide/switch-ASIC-wide stuff.
>
> Use cases:
> 1) get/set of port type (Ethernet/InfiniBand)
> 2) monitoring of hardware messages to and from chip
> 3) setting up port splitters - split port into multiple ones and squash again,
> enables usage of splitter cable
> 4) setting up shared buffers - shared among multiple ports within one chip
>
> First patch of this set introduces a new generic Netlink based interface,
> called "devlink". It is similar to nl80211 model and it is heavily
> influenced by it, including the API definition. The devlink introduction patch
> implements use cases 1) and 2). Other 2 are in development atm and will
> be addressed by follow-ups.
>
> It is very convenient for drivers to use devlink, as you can see in other
> patches in this set.
>
> Counterpart for devlink is userspace tool called "dl". Command line interface
> and outputs are derived from "ip" tool so it should be easy for users to get
> used to it.
>
> It is available here:
> https://github.com/jpirko/devlink
IHMO this very short command name "dl" is not an advantage. It is
simply too unspecific and short for a good Google search. E.g. when
searching for good examples for using "dl". I think "devlink" would be
better. If you like short commands do: alias dl="devlink"
> Example usage:
> butter:~$ dl help
> Usage: dl [ OPTIONS ] OBJECT { COMMAND | help }
> where OBJECT := { dev | port | monitor }
> OPTIONS := { -v/--verbose }
>
> butter:~$ dl dev show
> 0: devlink0: bus pci dev 0000:01:00.0
>
> butter:~$ dl port help
> Usage: dl port show [DEV/PORT_INDEX]
> Usage: dl port set DEV/PORT_INDEX [ type { eth | ib | auto} ]
>
> butter:~$ dl port show
> devlink0/1: type ib ibdev mlx4_0
> devlink0/2: type ib ibdev mlx4_0
>
> butter:~$ sudo dl port set devlink0/1 type eth
>
> butter:~$ dl port show
> devlink0/1: type eth netdev ens4
> devlink0/2: type ib ibdev mlx4_0
>
> butter:~$ sudo dl port set devlink0/1 type auto
>
> butter:~$ dl port show
> devlink0/1: type eth(auto) netdev ens4
> devlink0/2: type ib ibdev mlx4_0
--
Best regards,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer
MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat
Author of http://www.iptv-analyzer.org
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer
Powered by blists - more mailing lists