lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 02:12:55 +0100 From: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org> To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> Cc: Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>, Simon McVittie <simon.mcvittie@...labora.co.uk>, Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, ???????? ?????????????????? <socketpair@...il.com>, David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@...il.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] unix: properly account for FDs passed over unix sockets On 03.02.2016 01:57, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote: > On 02.02.2016 23:11, Linus Torvalds wrote: >> But I'm OK with that patch as is if you prefer it that way (maybe you >> want >> to use the cred to then test for root separately etc, out maybe there >> already was done use of cred as cred that I just missed when reading the >> patch on my phone..) > > I don't see any reason to switch over to struct user_struct. I tested a > patch and will send it out soon. I meant that there is no reason not to switch over to struct user_struct. Patch is send out. Thanks for looking into this! Hannes
Powered by blists - more mailing lists