netdev - Re: [PATCH net V1 0/3] mlx5 driver fixes for 4.5-rc2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <56B76660.4050105@mellanox.com>
Date:	Sun, 7 Feb 2016 17:44:32 +0200
From:	Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>
To:	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>,
	"Matan Barak" <matanb@...lanox.com>,
	Eran Ben Elisha <eranbe@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net V1 0/3] mlx5 driver fixes for 4.5-rc2

On 2/2/2016 5:26 PM, Or Gerlitz wrote:
> We added here a patch from Matan and Alaa for addressing Linus comments on
> the mess w.r.t reserved field names in the driver/firmware auto-generated file.
>
> Once the patch hits linus tree, we'll ask Doug to rebase his tree on that
> rc so both net-next and rdma-next development for 4.6 will be done under
> the fixed robust form.

Hi Dave,

We've identified few places in the auto generated file where the naming 
conversion
of reserved fields was not fully applied. Since the patch only did 
re-naming of
reserved fields which are not used for existing functionality, the 
testing we did
under the modified header file didn't catch that...

We'll respin the patch and series.

Or.