netdev - Re: [PATCH net V1 0/3] mlx5 driver fixes for 4.5-rc2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20160207.134440.449917136946691623.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Sun, 07 Feb 2016 13:44:40 -0500 (EST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	ogerlitz@...lanox.com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, saeedm@...lanox.com, matanb@...lanox.com,
	eranbe@...lanox.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net V1 0/3] mlx5 driver fixes for 4.5-rc2

From: Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2016 17:44:32 +0200

> On 2/2/2016 5:26 PM, Or Gerlitz wrote:
>> We added here a patch from Matan and Alaa for addressing Linus
>> comments on
>> the mess w.r.t reserved field names in the driver/firmware
>> auto-generated file.
>>
>> Once the patch hits linus tree, we'll ask Doug to rebase his tree on
>> that
>> rc so both net-next and rdma-next development for 4.6 will be done
>> under
>> the fixed robust form.
> 
> Hi Dave,
> 
> We've identified few places in the auto generated file where the
> naming conversion
> of reserved fields was not fully applied. Since the patch only did
> re-naming of
> reserved fields which are not used for existing functionality, the
> testing we did
> under the modified header file didn't catch that...
> 
> We'll respin the patch and series.

Ok.