[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160210181350.GI9492@lunn.ch>
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 19:13:50 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Bryan.Whitehead@...rochip.com
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, corbet@....net
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] Add LAN9352 Ethernet Driver
On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 08:40:30PM +0000, Bryan.Whitehead@...rochip.com wrote:
> This is the initial submission of an ethernet driver for
> the Microchip LAN9352.
>
> The LAN9352 is a 2-Port 10/100 Managed Ethernet Switch
> with 16-Bit Non-PCI CPU Interface.
>
> While the LAN9352 is a Managed Ethernet Switch, this driver
> only supports a simple ethernet controller interface.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bryan Whitehead <Bryan.Whitehead@...rochip.com>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/mchp9352.txt | 31 +
> MAINTAINERS | 9 +
> drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/Kconfig | 23 +-
> drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/mchp9352.c | 2593 ++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/mchp9352.h | 448 ++++
> 6 files changed, 3104 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/mchp9352.txt
> create mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/mchp9352.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/mchp9352.h
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/mchp9352.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/mchp9352.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..5b22e73
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/mchp9352.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
> +* Microchip LAN9352 Controller
> +
> +Required properties:
> +- compatible : Should be "microchip,lan9352"
> +- reg : Address and length of the io space for Microchip LAN
> +- interrupts : Should contain Microchip LAN interrupt line
> +- interrupt-parent : Should be the phandle for the interrupt controller
> + that services interrupts for this device
> +- phy-mode : See ethernet.txt file in the same directory
Hi Bryan
You say this is a 2 port switch. So which port does this phy-mode
apply to? Should this be a per port property?
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists