[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAM_iQpVgSOs5F6L6n2MhFxxuHaZizm7xzmYTE6HyRJXP9O67cg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 14:24:00 -0800
From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To: Mahesh Bandewar <mahesh@...dewar.net>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Mahesh Bandewar <maheshb@...gle.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 next 1/3] ipvlan: scrub skb before routing in L3 mode.
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 7:33 AM, Mahesh Bandewar <mahesh@...dewar.net> wrote:
> From: Mahesh Bandewar <maheshb@...gle.com>
>
> Scrub skb before hitting the iptable hooks to ensure packets hit
> these hooks.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mahesh Bandewar <maheshb@...gle.com>
> ---
> v1: initial patch
> v2: resend
>
> drivers/net/ipvlan/ipvlan_core.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ipvlan/ipvlan_core.c b/drivers/net/ipvlan/ipvlan_core.c
> index 8c48bb2a94ea..21c380f9ccd5 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ipvlan/ipvlan_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ipvlan/ipvlan_core.c
> @@ -365,7 +365,7 @@ static int ipvlan_process_v4_outbound(struct sk_buff *skb)
> ip_rt_put(rt);
> goto err;
> }
> - skb_dst_drop(skb);
> + skb_scrub_packet(skb, false);
Hmm, I am feeling we should set the xnet param to be true here when the ipvlan
device is in a different namespace with the physical one?
> skb_dst_set(skb, &rt->dst);
> err = ip_local_out(net, skb->sk, skb);
> if (unlikely(net_xmit_eval(err)))
> @@ -403,7 +403,7 @@ static int ipvlan_process_v6_outbound(struct sk_buff *skb)
> dst_release(dst);
> goto err;
> }
> - skb_dst_drop(skb);
> + skb_scrub_packet(skb, false);
Ditto.
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists