netdev - Re: [PATCHv2 next 1/3] ipvlan: scrub skb before routing in L3 mode.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAF2d9jgpuGQzxcLu6PvtJXZGs6zmLwF9FTvVV1KJxLf_CfRXDw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 17 Feb 2016 11:15:29 -0800
From:	Mahesh Bandewar <maheshb@...gle.com>
To:	Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Cc:	Mahesh Bandewar <mahesh@...dewar.net>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 next 1/3] ipvlan: scrub skb before routing in L3 mode.

On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 2:24 PM, Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 7:33 AM, Mahesh Bandewar <mahesh@...dewar.net> wrote:
>> From: Mahesh Bandewar <maheshb@...gle.com>
>>
>> Scrub skb before hitting the iptable hooks to ensure packets hit
>> these hooks.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mahesh Bandewar <maheshb@...gle.com>
>> ---
>> v1: initial patch
>> v2: resend
>>
>>  drivers/net/ipvlan/ipvlan_core.c | 4 ++--
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ipvlan/ipvlan_core.c b/drivers/net/ipvlan/ipvlan_core.c
>> index 8c48bb2a94ea..21c380f9ccd5 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ipvlan/ipvlan_core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ipvlan/ipvlan_core.c
>> @@ -365,7 +365,7 @@ static int ipvlan_process_v4_outbound(struct sk_buff *skb)
>>                 ip_rt_put(rt);
>>                 goto err;
>>         }
>> -       skb_dst_drop(skb);
>> +       skb_scrub_packet(skb, false);
>
> Hmm, I am feeling we should set the xnet param to be true here when the ipvlan
> device is in a different namespace with the physical one?
>
Yes, that makes sense. I'll update the patch to reflect that.

>
>>         skb_dst_set(skb, &rt->dst);
>>         err = ip_local_out(net, skb->sk, skb);
>>         if (unlikely(net_xmit_eval(err)))
>> @@ -403,7 +403,7 @@ static int ipvlan_process_v6_outbound(struct sk_buff *skb)
>>                 dst_release(dst);
>>                 goto err;
>>         }
>> -       skb_dst_drop(skb);
>> +       skb_scrub_packet(skb, false);
>
> Ditto.
>
> Thanks!