[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJ3xEMh2tcOXrbWT7qMx=yVLPSnrFy=68EuhZGS7FBLwqgHVaA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 17:48:14 +0200
From: Or Gerlitz <gerlitz.or@...il.com>
To: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@....mellanox.co.il>
Cc: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Tal Alon <talal@...lanox.com>,
Eran Ben Elisha <eranbe@...lanox.com>,
Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...lanox.com>,
Rana Shahout <ranas@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 04/12] net/mlx5e: Support DCBNL IEEE ETS
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 2:00 PM, Saeed Mahameed
<saeedm@....mellanox.co.il> wrote:
>>> struct mlx5e_priv {
>>> /* priv data path fields - start */
>>> - int default_vlan_prio;
>>> struct mlx5e_sq **txq_to_sq_map;
>>> int channeltc_to_txq_map[MLX5E_MAX_NUM_CHANNELS][MLX5E_MAX_NUM_TC];
>>> /* priv data path fields - end */
>>
>>
>> Didn't see a note on the removal of the default vlan prio in the
>> change-log, could you elaborate what was the role of it before the
>> patch and why we can just throw it?
>>
> it did nothing other than holding the number "0" which is always the
> default prio for vlans
> it was replaced with a the real 0 (the hardcoded "0") in the following lines:
okay, I would spare a sentence on that removal in the change, just in
case someone lands
here in future bisections and wonders why we removed this.
>> we're happily in 2016 (please fix here and also in other patches that
>> introduce new files)
> Ok.
cool
Powered by blists - more mailing lists