[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1455729280.5509.64.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 18:14:40 +0100
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: jbenc@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, pshelar@...ira.com,
tgraf@...g.ch, jesse@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] lwt: fix rx checksum setting for lwt devices
tunneling over ipv6
On Tue, 2016-02-16 at 15:40 -0500, David Miller wrote:
> > Oh yes, I'm mixing different parts of the conversation. We must
> > accept on RX zero checksum fields even for ipv6 because of the way the
> > VXLAN RFC is worded, correct.
>
> Paolo, can you please respin your patch against 'net'? I get rejects.
Sure. I'll resubmit soon,
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists