[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160216.154555.1807667652677383104.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 15:45:55 -0500 (EST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: jesse@...nel.org
Cc: jbenc@...hat.com, pabeni@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
pshelar@...ira.com, tgraf@...g.ch
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] lwt: fix rx checksum setting for lwt devices
tunneling over ipv6
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 15:40:04 -0500 (EST)
> Oh yes, I'm mixing different parts of the conversation. We must
> accept on RX zero checksum fields even for ipv6 because of the way the
> VXLAN RFC is worded, correct.
Paolo, can you please respin your patch against 'net'? I get rejects.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists