[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56C5C45D.9050807@cogentembedded.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 16:17:17 +0300
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
To: Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
Cc: lvs-devel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
Wensong Zhang <wensong@...ux-vs.org>,
Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>
Subject: Re: [PATCH nf 2/3] netfilter: ipvs: allow rescheduling after RST
Hello.
On 2/18/2016 3:41 AM, Simon Horman wrote:
> From: Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>
>
> "RFC 5961, 4.2. Mitigation" describes a mechanism to request
> client to confirm with RST the restart of TCP connection
> before resending its SYN. As result, IPVS can see SYNs for
> existing connection in CLOSE state. Add check to allow
> rescheduling in this state.
>
> Signed-off-by: Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>
> Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
> ---
> net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c
> index 4da560005b0e..0c1d3fef9a7c 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c
> @@ -1089,6 +1089,7 @@ static inline bool is_new_conn_expected(const struct ip_vs_conn *cp,
> switch (cp->protocol) {
> case IPPROTO_TCP:
> return (cp->state == IP_VS_TCP_S_TIME_WAIT) ||
> + cp->state == IP_VS_TCP_S_CLOSE ||
I would have been consistent and enclosed this expression into parens as
well. BTW, the indentation is not correct anyway.
> ((conn_reuse_mode & 2) &&
> (cp->state == IP_VS_TCP_S_FIN_WAIT) &&
> (cp->flags & IP_VS_CONN_F_NOOUTPUT));
MBR, Sergei
Powered by blists - more mailing lists