netdev - Re: [PATCH 2/2] net, thunderx: Use bool in structs where possible

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160218164217.GP24726@rric.localdomain>
Date:	Thu, 18 Feb 2016 17:42:17 +0100
From:	Robert Richter <robert.richter@...iumnetworks.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	<sgoutham@...ium.com>, <rric@...nel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] net, thunderx: Use bool in structs where possible

On 18.02.16 11:05:14, David Miller wrote:
> From: Robert Richter <rrichter@...iumnetworks.com>
> Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 13:39:09 +0100
> 
> > From: Robert Richter <rrichter@...ium.com>
> > 
> > Looks like the :1 notation was accidentally introduced (this still
> > uses 1 byte per flag). Using bool instead, which is the common use.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Robert Richter <rrichter@...ium.com>
> 
> Such cleanups are not appropriate for 'net'.  Only real bug fixes should
> be targetted that.
> 
> Respin these patches targetting the correct tree(s).

Do you mean posting the two as "trivial" patches?

Thanks,

-Robert