[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJ3xEMh-6WS4VADHbKgLDduz6rpECate7giXqSNpQP3Se-ZpQw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 19:02:46 +0200
From: Or Gerlitz <gerlitz.or@...il.com>
To: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>,
Tal Alon <talal@...lanox.com>,
Eran Ben Elisha <eranbe@...lanox.com>,
Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...lanox.com>,
Rana Shahout <ranas@...lanox.com>,
Yevgeny Petrilin <yevgenyp@...lanox.com>,
Matthew Finlay <matt@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next V1 04/12] net/mlx5e: Support DCBNL IEEE ETS
On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 12:32 PM, Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com> wrote:
> @@ -2164,6 +2233,9 @@ static void mlx5e_build_netdev(struct net_device *netdev)
> netdev->watchdog_timeo = 15 * HZ;
>
> netdev->ethtool_ops = &mlx5e_ethtool_ops;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MLX5_CORE_EN_DCB
> + netdev->dcbnl_ops = &mlx5e_dcbnl_ops;
> +#endif
I guess we don't want VF drivers to control the uplink port QoS
arbiter, PFC setup and such, agree -- I gave this comment on V0
and you somehow missed addressing that, please do for V2.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists