[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160219012748.GA17251@altlinux.org>
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 04:27:48 +0300
From: "Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@...linux.org>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] unix_diag: fix incorrect sign extension in unix_lookup_by_ino
The value passed by unix_diag_get_exact to unix_lookup_by_ino has type
__u32, but unix_lookup_by_ino's argument ino has type int, which is not
a problem yet.
However, when ino is compared with sock_i_ino return value of type
unsigned long, ino is sign extended to signed long, and this results
to incorrect comparison on 64-bit architectures for inode numbers
greater than INT_MAX.
This bug was found by strace test suite.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry V. Levin <ldv@...linux.org>
Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
---
net/unix/diag.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/unix/diag.c b/net/unix/diag.c
index c512f64..4d96797 100644
--- a/net/unix/diag.c
+++ b/net/unix/diag.c
@@ -220,23 +220,23 @@ done:
return skb->len;
}
-static struct sock *unix_lookup_by_ino(int ino)
+static struct sock *unix_lookup_by_ino(unsigned int ino)
{
int i;
struct sock *sk;
spin_lock(&unix_table_lock);
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(unix_socket_table); i++) {
sk_for_each(sk, &unix_socket_table[i])
if (ino == sock_i_ino(sk)) {
sock_hold(sk);
spin_unlock(&unix_table_lock);
return sk;
}
}
spin_unlock(&unix_table_lock);
return NULL;
}
--
ldv
Powered by blists - more mailing lists