lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAM_iQpX4c7v2HbMG7cPi3T=HTHeEGhEQTSNS6CxX0tY=7KA4Uw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 19 Feb 2016 16:21:14 -0800
From:	Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To:	"Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@...linux.org>
Cc:	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com>,
	Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] unix_diag: fix incorrect sign extension in unix_lookup_by_ino

On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 5:27 PM, Dmitry V. Levin <ldv@...linux.org> wrote:
> The value passed by unix_diag_get_exact to unix_lookup_by_ino has type
> __u32, but unix_lookup_by_ino's argument ino has type int, which is not
> a problem yet.
> However, when ino is compared with sock_i_ino return value of type
> unsigned long, ino is sign extended to signed long, and this results
> to incorrect comparison on 64-bit architectures for inode numbers
> greater than INT_MAX.
>
> This bug was found by strace test suite.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry V. Levin <ldv@...linux.org>
> Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>

Fixes: 5d3cae8bc39d ("unix_diag: Dumping exact socket core")
Acked-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>

Thanks.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ