[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJ3xEMibGLtTVYVHqjvHTMUPB3xU6MHnLJ4dhKPPnzq-e==-+Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 10:21:24 +0200
From: Or Gerlitz <gerlitz.or@...il.com>
To: Tom Herbert <tom@...bertland.com>
Cc: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>,
Tal Alon <talal@...lanox.com>,
Eran Ben Elisha <eranbe@...lanox.com>,
Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...lanox.com>,
Rana Shahout <ranas@...lanox.com>,
Yevgeny Petrilin <yevgenyp@...lanox.com>,
Matthew Finlay <matt@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next V1 08/12] net/mlx5e: Move to checksum complete
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 4:25 AM, Tom Herbert <tom@...bertland.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 2:32 AM, Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com> wrote:
>> From: Matthew Finlay <matt@...lanox.com>
>> Use checksum complete for all IP packets, unless they are HW LRO,
>> in which case, use checksum unnecessary.
> Awesome!
I know...
> Thanks for this fix.
we consider it a feature ...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists