netdev - Re: [PATCH net] be2net: don't {en,dis}able filters on BE3 when transparent tagging is enabled

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKvpyk1BeNUXk5t1tb7OHMwxFWobFv6rrdoXdXrxTAwxOWMi5g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 29 Feb 2016 09:41:08 +0530
From:	Sathya Perla <sathya.perla@...adcom.com>
To:	Ivan Vecera <ivecera@...hat.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Sriharsha Basavapatna <sriharsha.basavapatna@...adcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] be2net: don't {en,dis}able filters on BE3 when
 transparent tagging is enabled

On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 6:43 PM, Ivan Vecera <ivecera@...hat.com> wrote:
> Should the MULTICAST bit be masked in any be_cmd_rx_filter() call on BE3's
> VFs if the trans. tagging is enabled?

Not on any be_cmd_rx_filter() call, but on the first call in
be_open()->be_if_enable_filters() where the basic filtering flags are
being enabled and the driver is explicitly checking for the return
status. We have a fix for this already in our internal builds that
hasn't been upstreamed yet. Will send out a patch for this asap.
Thanks for the help on this Ivan!