netdev - Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [next] igb: allow setting MAC address on i211 using a device tree blob V5

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <63942260-AF46-475D-9963-8A7A10484906@gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 2 Mar 2016 04:48:28 +0100
From:	John Holland <jotihojr@...il.com>
To:	Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
Cc:	"Brown, Aaron F" <aaron.f.brown@...el.com>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org" <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [next] igb: allow setting MAC address on i211 using a device tree blob V5


> On 02.03.2016, at 00:55, Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com> wrote:
> 
>> On Tue, 2016-03-01 at 07:56 +0100, John Holland wrote:
>> On Mar 1, 2016, at 03:52, Brown, Aaron F <aaron.f.brown@...el.com>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> This throws a few checkpatch warnings, but I won't withhold my
>> tested by for these:
>>>  
>>> total: 0 errors, 2 warnings, 0 checks, 21 lines checked
>>>  
>>> Your patch has style problems, please review.
>>>  
>>> NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report
>>>       them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS.
>>> u1463:[0]/usr/src/kernels/next-queue>
>> 
>> Thanks for testing...
>> 
>> Do you require me to reformat the patch text? And won't that break
>> the link?
> 
> No, that checkpatch.pl warning on the link you provided is fine,
> although I will clean up your signed-off-by when I go to push it
> upstream. :-)

Thank you very much!